• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS

TfL’s phoney “war” on fare dodgers

February 16, 2012 by Martin Hoscik

Penalties were meant to increase on January 2nd
As I reported last month, penalty fares are going up this weekend.

Expect a flurry of reports repeating Transport for London’s rhetoric of a “war” on fare dodgers who now face penalties of £80 for cheating the system.

But this is the phoniest of wars which seems to tie-in with the Mayor and TfL’s desire to tackle the “perception” of fare dodging on the new bus when it enters passenger trials in a few days time.

As reported previously, a Mayoral Decision (MD) signed off by Boris Johnson clearly instructed TfL to introduce the new penalties on 2 January 2012.

TfL later said they were unable to do so because there was insufficient time to put up notices on every Tube, DLR and Overground carriage and bus in order to make the penalties effective from that date.

An answer from Johnson provided to London Assembly Member Caroline Pidgeon implies TfL’s inability to comply with the start date only arose after the Mayor had given them their orders.

Johnson says:

“The process involved in the implementation of a revised Penalty Fare is a lengthy one. Consultation on this change began in August 2011, with a closing date of 21 October 2011. At that point it had been TfL’s intention to implement the changes in line with the general fares revision on 2 January 2012.

“Due to the level of interest in the consultation and the detailed responses required to the issues raised, the sign off process for the decision took longer than anticipated. As a result, TfL advised that although the powers should still come into force on 2 January 2012, an implementation on that date would not allow sufficient time to update all network signage. For this reason, the decision was taken to delay implementation until 19 February 2012.”

Yet the Mayor put his name to the official instruction in November, after the consultation responses were received so why were problems only flagged up later?

The MD includes the consultation responses, makes clear the intent to save money by sharing publicity costs for the increase with the general fares increase publicity campaign and reports TfL’s confidence that it could meet the January 2nd deadline.

The document clearly sates: “there are requirements for the display of notices in buses, trains and trams, informing passengers of the level of penalty fares. TfL have advised GLA officers that arrangements are in place to deliver this by the proposed implementation date of 02 January 2012”.

Yet despite this, the Mayor maintains he’s content with the advice given by his officials.

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Martin Hoscik

RECENT UPDATES

Tube and rail users to benefit from Oyster weekly fares cap

Mayor and TfL call on ministers to help plug funding gap

Tube to get full mobile phone coverage from 2024

TfL says Direct Vision Standard is already making HGVs safer for London road users




POPULAR

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

Copyright © 2025 · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy