• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS

Is the Deputy Mayor for Policing a politically restricted job?

May 8, 2012 by Martin Hoscik

A lot of online noise is being generated by the Standard’s report that Stephen Greenhalgh is to be the new Deputy Mayor for Policing.

As Greenhalgh is a councillor it’s claimed that his appointment breaches the so-called Widdicombe rules on politically restricted posts.

I don’t think that’s the case – though I’m open to being proven wrong.

The Deputy Mayor for Policing is a statutory role created by Parliament when it passed the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011.

The act allows for the functions of the MOPC to be carried out by the Mayor or a Deputy Mayor for Policing.

The Deputy can be an Assembly member but doesn’t have to be. Where it’s not an AM the Act provides a list of exclusions for who can be appointed of which local councillor isn’t one.

As the Mayor and an AM are clearly political it would make no sense for a non-AM Deputy to be politically restricted.

On a related point, where the Deputy Mayor isn’t an AM their appointment can be vetoed by the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee on a two-thirds vote.

Update: My attention has been drawn to a second list which includes a number of political post holders excluded from being Deputy Mayor for Policing but again does not list councillor.

Update 9th May. I’m now told “The post of Dep Mayor Policing and head of MOPC is a member of staff of the MOPC if they are not an Assembly Member and cannot be an elected councillor of another authority.”

Earlier on Wednesday Labour’s Val Shawcross issued the following statement: “This is a complete shambles. It is clear that the mayor has made a serious mistake, Mr Greenhalgh is a sitting councillor which bars him from taking a senior paid position in local government. The rules are very clear on this matter. They haven’t announced that Cllr Greenhalgh has stood down, so I believe this is in breach of the Local Government Act 1989.”

“These rules are very clear and everybody working in and around local government is aware of them, the mayor even made this mistake in 2008 with another appointment, you would have thought they’d have got it right this time round.”

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Martin Hoscik

RECENT UPDATES

Tube and rail users to benefit from Oyster weekly fares cap

Mayor and TfL call on ministers to help plug funding gap

Tube to get full mobile phone coverage from 2024

TfL says Direct Vision Standard is already making HGVs safer for London road users




POPULAR

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

Copyright © 2025 · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy