• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • Twitter

Database glitch delayed London mayoral election results

June 16, 2016 - Martin Hoscik@MayorWatch

Confirmation of Mr Khan's victory was significantly delayed.
Confirmation of Mr Khan’s victory was significantly delayed.
Delays in declaring Sadiq Khan’s victory in last month’s mayoral election were caused by an incorrect setting on the database servers used to count Londoners’ votes, London Assembly members were told on Thursday.

Elections for the Mayor and Assembly use three separate ballot papers, one each for the Assembly constituency and London-wide list contest and a third paper on which Londoners can cast a first and second preference vote in the mayoral race.

To help simplify and speed up counting, the ballot papers are scanned and the voters’ choices stored in a database from which software then calculates the results of each of the three contests.

Counting started on Friday May 6th and progress was sufficiently speedy that some officials and commentators speculated London was set for the earliest ever declaration.

However progress was suddenly delayed when, “just before” 4pm, staff from system providers IntElect became aware of discrepancies in the tally of votes recorded for each mayoral candidate.

On Thursday Greater London Returning Officer Jeff Jacobs told an Assembly panel set up to investigate the delays that IntElect reported these discrepancies to his team “about an hour later” at 5.15pm.

Jacobs then initiated an “urgent internal discussion” with City Hall’s legal team which subsequently confirmed “small discrepancies” between the “printed mayoral results” and the number of ballot papers.

At around 6.40pm IntElect “reconfirmed” the problem and identified a “coding issue” as the cause.

The firm later advised it could produce a “consolidated” result from the raw master database of votes but said it wasn’t possible to say how long that would take.

Mr Jacobs said he “rejected” suggestions that he abandon attempts to declare the mayoral result and ask candidates, staff and media to return the following day.

He also admitted to doubts about a decision not to “actively” brief the media and candidates’ agents about the delays sooner, but said he took that decision because it wasn’t possible to accurately answer questions until around 9pm.

The time taken for IntElect to manually calculate and verify the result meant Sadiq Khan’s victory over Tory rival Zac Goldsmith was only finally confirmed in the early hours of Saturday, 7th May.

Appearing alongside Mr Jacobs, IntElect CEO Steve Gowers told AMs that a setting on the database server meant the number of votes for each candidate wasn’t received in the correct order and that this was responsible for the discrepancies.

Assembly Members are expected to produce a list of recommendations aimed at avoiding any glitches at the 2020 election. It’s understood this could include asking IntElect to reimburse City Hall for some or all of the costs caused by the delays.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

RECENT UPDATES

Tube and rail users to benefit from Oyster weekly fares cap

Mayor and TfL call on ministers to help plug funding gap

Tube to get full mobile phone coverage from 2024

TfL says Direct Vision Standard is already making HGVs safer for London road users




POPULAR

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.