Boris Johnson has planning policies which restrict the number of parking spaces which go with each new dwelling. The Government want to let developers provide as many parking spaces as they want.
The basic problem, which the Government have failed to grasp, is that if you have the right policies you can fit another 100,000 people a year into London, but you can’t fit another 100,000 cars. Business will suffer if we have more cars and Londoner’s health will take a hit as well.
The Mayor’s report on building new infrastructure by 2050 says that under the existing ‘tight’ rules and current levels of car ownership, we will need an area the size of Richmond Park to park all the new cars. If the Government get their way, we will be jamming cars onto lots of the land where we are hoping to build new houses, schools and businesses.
Of course, the other problem with having all these cars clogging up new developments in London is that people will then expect to drive them somewhere and that is when things get really silly. The Mayor is already predicting that traffic will grow by nearly a quarter in many areas of east London in the next fifteen years.
I’m not surprised, I recently worked out that just nine of the big developments which the Mayor has signed off, include parking for 12,000 vehicles. These are now being built. If you encourage more car ownership then you get more congestion and essential business traffic slows down.
The Government describe traffic growth as inevitable, but London shows it isn’t. Since 2000, London’s population has gone up by an average of 100,000 a year, but until recently, car traffic has dropped by 1% a year. That means less CO2 emissions and easier journeys for the millions who travel to work by bus.
This record of success is now starting to come apart as the Mayor’s policies of smoothing traffic flow encourage a few more drivers onto London’s roads. Getting rid of road works and changing traffic lights so that you reduced delays to cars and lorries, was the big policy idea when Boris was elected Mayor in 2008. It is a self-defeating approach which has led to recent increases in traffic and falls in journey time reliability.
We need more developments which are virtually car free, not fewer. We need parking for car club vehicles and people with disabilities, but public transport, walking and cycling need to be seen as the best ways to get around. That is the only future which works in a city as big and complex as London.
Those are the priorities which we should build into our new houses, shops and businesses, whether you live within inner London or outer London. A future based on buses and bikes is the only way to keep our roads moving.
Darren Johnson is a Green Party member of the London Assembly. Follow his work on Twitter at @darrenjohnsonam and via the London Green Party website.
G Smith says
What happened to the Electric Vehicle initiative. We certainly need no more vehicles but those that are allowed into Central London should be EV by a near future date. I bought one 3 years ago but the charging facilities are no better and points are frequently out of service. Also one is mostly forced into a very expensive car part to access a chargepoint.
G Smith says
What happened to the EV initiative? I bought one 3 years ago since then there had been little progress towards enforcing the use of these and the charging point network is a farce
Tony Woolf says
Car free developments are completely ineffective in reducing car traffic in London. But “something must be done”, and they are something, so the greens and greenwashers will shout about them. Of course.the accommodation will sell only to those who almost certainly wouldn’t have cars anyway, such as the elderly, and young people who find it easier and cheaper to cycle, motorbike or use public transport.
Car free housing is already forced on some people in social housing who have no choice, and in some cases suffer because they can’t use a car – for example those who need one for work because they have to carry tools or travel at night. Of course private flats in the same developments have private parking spaces or the right to use residents’ parking on the roads.
Don’t get me wrong, I cycle in London often and drive very seldom, and I’m strongly in favour of reducing motor traffic in central London. But I want a way to do this that is effective, not one that is ineffective and largely forced on those who are having a hard time anyway.
SimonS says
“Of course private flats in the same developments have private parking spaces or the right to use residents’ parking on the roads.”
Do you have any evidence for this? It’s not the case in Lambeth. However, the development I live in hasn’t got the secure bike parking (or nearly enough bike parking space).