• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • Twitter

TfL’s cutting bus services so why’s it wasting resources trialling an on-demand minibus Ford’s Chariot shows isn’t sustainable?

February 22, 2019 - Martin Hoscik@MayorWatch

Image: Ford.
Earlier this week one of Transport for London’s more breathlessly excited press releases arrived in inboxes announcing that the agency “plans to trial an innovative ‘on-demand’ bus service” which will allow the people of Sutton to book seats on a minibus via their smartphone.

The service will run in “areas not currently served by public transport” – or to put it another way, in places where TfL has previously failed to provide bus services.

The agency won’t say how much the trial will cost, citing its usual commercial confidentiality line, but we can assume that the app and supporting infrastructure, plus the eight Mercedes Cityline Sprinter vehicles and drivers collectively carry a hefty price tag.

And, as the fares will be higher than the usual TfL bus fare and won’t be included in Oyster, the operation costs are clearly more per passenger journey than on a standard bus route.

Michael Hurwitz, TfL’s Director of Innovation, is very excited, gushing: “We are always looking at how we can harness the latest technological developments in transport to improve the service for our customers.”

But passengers in those areas where TfL’s shortening and axing dozens of bus routes might wonder how the agency has cash to spend on this venture while they’re about to face significant disruption to their daily commute.

Two of the stated project criteria are “to understand the economics of a demand responsive bus service,” and “to understand if a demand-responsive service will support the objectives of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy in reducing car dependency.”

All very laudable, but a quick phone call to the States could have provided those answers.

Ford, one of the world’s largest car makers, has already tried making such a venture work – the firm has been running its Chariot service both in the US and more recently here in London.

Like TfL’s trial, it deployed a fleet of 14-seater minibuses which users could summon via an app and, like TfL, it envisaged the service playing a part in getting people out of their cars and easing congestion.

Unlike TfL, it’s already concluded that such a service isn’t “sustainable” – Chariot closed its London operations on January 25th and its US operations were mothballed the following week.

TfL first mooted this venture a year ago, since when it’s been tested and rejected as viable by an organisation with far more resources than it has.

Yet neither the failure of Chariot nor the often lamentable performance of TfL’s existing ‘responsive’ and less tech-dependent minibus service appear to have informed its thinking or tempered its enthusiasm.

I asked TfL for a copy of the criteria it’ll use to determine whether the trial has been successful – it fudged by providing a copy of the trial objectives instead. Perhaps the London Assembly’s transport committee will have more luck.

The best way to get people out of their cars and onto public transport is to boost the services which already exist, including creating new bus routes integrated into the main network, not to create a mess of regional services with different fare structures and bespoke hailing arrangements.

London’s first mayor, Ken Livingstone, proved this when he invested heavily in new buses and routes, delivering a dramatic increase in bus ridership that’s been allowed to slowly ebb away under his successors.

Rather than trying to ape large US firms or compete with the Taxi and minicab trades, TfL would be better revisting its own past successes.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

RECENT UPDATES

TfL proposes bus and tube cuts and annual fares increases to achieve long-term financial sustainability

London’s entire bus fleet now meets ULEZ emissions standards

New road layout comes into effect at Old Street roundabout

TfL funding enables creation of 2,000 new cycle parking spaces




Popular

1,700 extra Santander Cycles are coming to London’s streets

TfL confirms changes to Older Person’s Freedom Pass and 60+ Oyster card hours

TfL fares to rise in return for £1.6bn Government rescue package

Election for Mayor of London and London Assembly postponed until 2021

FEATURED

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 MayorWatch Publications Limited · MayorWatch is Registered Trademark · All Rights Reserved · Contact Us · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy

MayorWatch Publications Limited · 20-22 Wenlock Road · London N1 7GU · Company Number 6291816

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.