• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • Twitter

Questions raised after TfL report reveals staff destroyed key Garden Bridge paperwork

September 16, 2015 - Martin Hoscik@MayorWatch

Image: Garden Bridge Trust/Heatherwick Studios
Image: Garden Bridge Trust/Heatherwick Studios

An internal Transport for London report has revealed that “vital” paperwork relating to the garden bridge was destroyed by officials despite knowing London Assembly members and others were asking questions about its design and procurement.

Plans for the bridge, which is to be built and overseen by a dedicated trust, were originally drawn up by TfL after Mayor Boris Johnson ordered his transport agency to support the scheme.

Although the Mayor originally said TfL’s role would be limited to initial feasibility and development work, the organisation is now committed to providing £30m of funding for its construction and has underwritten its maintenance costs in perpetuity.

A number of figures, including Caroline Pidgeon, Leader of the Liberal Democrat group on the London Assembly, have questioned the rationale behind public support for the bridge.

Ms Pidgeon has also raised concerns about TfL’s decision to award to the contract for developing the scheme to the Thomas Heatherwick Studio despite more established bridge builders tendering for the job.

Following questions from Pidgeon, former TfL commissioner Sir Peter Hendy confirmed that a full review and audit of the agency’s involvement would be conducted and the results published

That review has found that a lack of clarity about the organisation’s role in awarding contracts for the bridge meant “policy and procedure with regard to communication with bidders and tender evaluation were not fully complied with.”

It also reveals that “supporting documentation relating to the individual technical evaluation scores” assigned to bids was “disposed of” and was unavailable for review as part of the audit.

According to the report “the documentation was held in hard copy by the TfL Planning Project Manager until recently when, as a result of an office move and introduction of hot desking policy, it was disposed of.”

As a consequence of this, the audit’s authors had to rely on “interviews with those involved” when considering whether proper procedure was followed.

However the report says the decision to award “the first tender evaluation was carried out in accordance with TfL procedures” and there there is no evidence to suggest “that the final recommendations did not provide value for money from the winning bidders.”

Ms Pidgeon says these findings are “nonsensical” given the destruction of “vital documentation” which means the audit cannot be considered “thorough and forensic”

She commented: “While it rightly highlights a number of areas where the process for awarding contracts needs to improve the audit is ultimately incomplete due to TfL destroying vital records.

“It is staggering that despite serious questions about the evaluation scores for the tenders TfL thought there was nothing wrong in destroying vital documentation just before the audit was set to take place.”

Responding to Ms Pidgeon’s comments a TfL spokesperson said: “An extensive and thorough review of the procurement has been undertaken by a separate audit team and this has concluded that the procurement of designers for the Garden Bridge was acceptable in relation to the selection of bidders and there is no evidence the process did not provide value for money.

“As part of this thorough review, the audit has identified that some supporting documents, in the form of hand written notes from interviews with bidders were disposed of earlier this year as part of an office move – two years after the interviews were carried out and before the audit was requested.

“However, all scores from the evaluation process that was undertaken were properly recorded and filed appropriately in line with TfL procedures. The audit confirms that the “tender evaluation was carried out in accordance with TfL procedures”.

“The fact these hand written notes could not be found as part of the recent audit has absolutely no bearing on the findings of the audit.”

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Tagged With: Garden Bridge

RECENT UPDATES

TfL proposes bus and tube cuts and annual fares increases to achieve long-term financial sustainability

London’s entire bus fleet now meets ULEZ emissions standards

New road layout comes into effect at Old Street roundabout

TfL funding enables creation of 2,000 new cycle parking spaces




Popular

1,700 extra Santander Cycles are coming to London’s streets

TfL confirms changes to Older Person’s Freedom Pass and 60+ Oyster card hours

TfL fares to rise in return for £1.6bn Government rescue package

Election for Mayor of London and London Assembly postponed until 2021

FEATURED

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 MayorWatch Publications Limited · MayorWatch is Registered Trademark · All Rights Reserved · Contact Us · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy

MayorWatch Publications Limited · 20-22 Wenlock Road · London N1 7GU · Company Number 6291816

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.