• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • Twitter

London Assembly investigation finds two thirds of passengers back rail devolution

October 16, 2015 - Val Shawcross@valshawcross

london_bridge_network_railWhen I invited Londoners to share their views with us about National Rail services back in May, we knew already that the rail network was facing serious problems.

The London Bridge fiasco over the winter of 2014/15 was still fresh in everyone’s minds. The situation there has stabilised now, but passengers will remember how they had to suffer long delays, cancellations and overcrowding at the height of the Thameslink upgrade works, even after operators had started using a reduced timetable.

In the investigation conducted by the Transport Committee since then, the message that has come through very strongly is that, while this was an extreme case, it wasn’t completely out of the ordinary.

Overcrowding, poor reliability and a failure to provide good customer services are become increasingly normal on much of the rail network.

Passengers have a right to expect that, as the cost of their tickets increase –rail fares on London services have increased 62% in cash terms in the past decade – they will see a corresponding improvement in services. They haven’t.

Crowding has grown in seriousness over the past five years. 40% of trains arriving in London in the morning peak are now officially overcrowded, and that’s not counting the passengers left on the platform because they can’t get on to trains that are already too crammed.

Across other major cities in England and Wales, the average number of overcrowded peak trains is just 14%.

Reliability has also taken a hit in the past five years. In London, 16% of peak trains fail to arrive at their destination within five minutes of their scheduled time. This kind of performance creates a drag on London’s economy, as businesses lose staff working hours.

I have long believed that one of the solutions to these problems, that really can ruin a Londoner’s commute, is to devolve control of rail services to Transport for London. It’s not the only thing that needs to happen, but it’s a reform that is proven to work.

Our analysis showed that TfL transformed the Silverlink franchise when it was devolved in 2007, and the London Overground was established. This is now one of the country’s best performing services when it comes to crowding and reliability.

The capacity and frequency of trains has increased, stations have been modified and additional staff recruited. It is no surprise that passenger satisfaction has gone up significantly, while it has been falling for other London rail services.

What was unclear at the start of the Assembly’s investigation was whether the Mayor and TfL could win sufficient support to convince the Government to take the bold step of devolving more services to London. In particular, the large suburban franchises that serve South London.

While passengers north of the Thames can access high-capacity, high-frequency tube services, only a small part of South London is connected to the tube. This makes National Rail a much more vital part of the transport network.

The key decision coming up is whether the Government devolves suburban routes of the South Eastern franchise, between Kent and central London, which expires in 2018. . . We have been here before, of course. The Government rejected similar proposals from the Mayor and TfL in 2013.

This time around, the Transport Committee identified that objections from partners outside London had to be addressed, and if possible reversed. London’s rail services, after all, are a resource for people living across the South East.

By engaging with local authorities and district councils outside London, the Committee has proven that our neighbours are now much more open to devolution. Kent County Council said it would support the reform if sufficient safeguards are in place.

There was enthusiastic support for TfL when we visited passenger representatives in Sevenoaks, where frustration with the existing train operating company has been growing.

Another thing that has changed after the Committee’s investigation is that the views of Londoners on the devolution proposals are now being heard. We conducted the first survey of London rail users about devolution, and found that 68% of them supported the idea of TfL managing their train service.

Such a strong endorsement of devolution from passengers and other key stakeholders should be very difficult for the Government to ignore.

Read our report ‘Devolving rail services to London: Towards a South London Metro’

Rail Devolution Report

Val Shawcross is Chair of the London Assembly Transport Committee, stay up to date with the Assembly’s work via @londonassembly.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Tagged With: Devolution

RECENT UPDATES

852 new homes to be built in Acton by Transport for London

HGV operators in London urged to apply for a Direct Vision Standard permit

TfL proposes bus and tube cuts and annual fares increases to achieve long-term financial sustainability

London’s entire bus fleet now meets ULEZ emissions standards




Popular

1,700 extra Santander Cycles are coming to London’s streets

TfL confirms changes to Older Person’s Freedom Pass and 60+ Oyster card hours

TfL fares to rise in return for £1.6bn Government rescue package

Election for Mayor of London and London Assembly postponed until 2021

FEATURED

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 MayorWatch Publications Limited · MayorWatch is Registered Trademark · All Rights Reserved · Contact Us · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy

MayorWatch Publications Limited · 20-22 Wenlock Road · London N1 7GU · Company Number 6291816

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.