• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • Twitter

By appointing an utterly superfluous Minister for London Theresa May risks the Tories looking like bad losers

July 18, 2016 - Martin Hoscik@MayorWatch

In May Sadiq Khan secured the largest personal mandate ever seen in this country so it’s disappointing to see the Conservatives foist an unaccountable Minister for London on the city.

After surviving the restoration of London government, the post eventually and thankfully became vacant in 2008 and remained dormant all the way through Boris Johnson’s two terms at City Hall when minsters and secretaries of state dealt direct with the capital’s mayor.

Yet over the weekend freshly installed Prime Minister Theresa May decided that interaction between Westminster and the Mayor could be improved by appointing Gavin Barwell as the part-time minister for London.

Let’s be clear – had Zac Goldsmith won in May, there would not now be a Minister for London. He, like Boris, would have been left to get on with the job without a ministerial appointee peering over his shoulder.

Reviving the post risks making May and the Tory Government look like sore losers – there is no decision or policy initiative which Barwell can oversee which would not best be dealt with by direct discussions between more senior ministers and Sadiq.

There’s a risk that instead of Sadiq and his officials continuing to deal with the decision makers in, for example, the DfT they suddenly find themselves expected to lobby alongside Barwell.

To me it looks very much like this position has been revived, in part at least, to allow the Tories to claim a slice of the credit for London’s continued success plus any big new initiatives so that they have a handy roll call of brags ready for the 2020 City Hall election.

If he’s not careful, our mayor risks finding himself sharing credit in Government press releases and resulting media coverage with the holder of the most unnecessary and disposable minister in all of Westminster.

And unless it’s suddenly announced that Barwell’s brief will be to work on a new devolution settlement for the capital, we’re all entitled to question whether a Government which thinks a Minister for London is necessary in 2016 really has any intent of handing over extra and meaningful powers and spending ability to the capital’s Labour mayor.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Tagged With: Devolution

RECENT UPDATES

Tube and rail users to benefit from Oyster weekly fares cap

Mayor and TfL call on ministers to help plug funding gap

Tube to get full mobile phone coverage from 2024

TfL says Direct Vision Standard is already making HGVs safer for London road users




POPULAR

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.