• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • Twitter

Prevent: Why London’s Greens can’t support the Assembly’s counter-extremism report

December 18, 2015 - Jenny Jones@greenjennyjones

jenny_royal_courtsThis week the London Assembly published a report calling for changes to the Government’s Prevent counter-extremism strategy. The Green party’s Baroness Jenny Jones explains why her group were unable to support the report.

We are concerned that no upfront definition of what is meant by extremism is made for the purposes of the report. However, we recognise that, along with the Government’s definition of ‘radicalisation’, these are very contested words and not all Members of the Committee would be able to agree a common definition.

Flexibility is obviously required when professionals seek to define what is and isn’t ‘extremism’, just as flexibility is required when debating what is ‘Britishness’, and the interpretation will often vary according to local circumstances.

But there are obvious dangers to this. For example, the Met Police have previously included at least one member of the London Assembly and several journalists in their database of ‘domestic extremists’. This shows how words such as ‘extremism’ can be interpreted in a surprisingly broad brush way.

We are also unhappy that while the report references the concerns raised about the Government’s focus on non-violent extremism, this is not reflected in the recommendations.

There is academic evidence that the ‘conveyor belt’ idea, which underpins the Government’s new approach to Prevent, is not a valid one. These academics argue that violent terrorists do not grow out of a culture of non-violent extremist ideas.

If these academics are right, then we believe there are three ways in which Prevent could be counter-productive.

First, it could alienate people who have ‘extremist’ ideas but would be potential allies in the fight against violent extremism.

Second, it may hinder the development of the counter-narrative in classrooms and colleges as communities withdraw from discussions in those controlled spaces.

Finally, we believe the larger the number of people being monitored as ‘extremists’, the thinner the spread of Met Police resources becomes.

We believe there should be consultation about whether the emphasis in Prevent on linking violent and non-violent extremism is having a detrimental effect on the work of those trying to engage in their communities and develop a counter-narrative.

We are concerned that the recommendations in the report avoid questioning the Prevent Strategy adopted by the Government. We believe the most significant barriers which the professionals and organisations are facing all stem from the way Prevent is being framed.

If we believe that counter terrorism increasingly relies on information gathered from communities, and less on intelligence services at home and abroad, then we need to radically overhaul programmes like ‘Prevent’.

If decent, law-abiding people view these programmes as counter-productive and we wish Prevent to be more successful on the ground, then it needs to address any fundamental problems in its approach which are creating barriers to implementation. Prevent is failing to win the hearts and minds of many people it needs to reach.

For these reasons we are unable to support this report.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

RECENT UPDATES

852 new homes to be built in Acton by Transport for London

HGV operators in London urged to apply for a Direct Vision Standard permit

TfL proposes bus and tube cuts and annual fares increases to achieve long-term financial sustainability

London’s entire bus fleet now meets ULEZ emissions standards




Popular

1,700 extra Santander Cycles are coming to London’s streets

TfL confirms changes to Older Person’s Freedom Pass and 60+ Oyster card hours

TfL fares to rise in return for £1.6bn Government rescue package

Election for Mayor of London and London Assembly postponed until 2021

FEATURED

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 MayorWatch Publications Limited · MayorWatch is Registered Trademark · All Rights Reserved · Contact Us · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy

MayorWatch Publications Limited · 20-22 Wenlock Road · London N1 7GU · Company Number 6291816

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.