• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS

Mixed response to latest East London bridge scheme

June 30, 2014 - Martin Hoscik

Image: HOK/London Chamber of Commerce
Image: HOK/London Chamber of Commerce
Designs for a proposed new bridge in East London have been unveiled by the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry as part of a campaign to secure political and public backing for the scheme.

Designed by architects HOK and Arup, the bridge would link Beckton and Thamesmead at Gallions Reach.

Supporters say the £600m scheme would boost East London’s economy by up to £55m each year but critics say it would increase congestion and pollution in the area.

Colin Stanbridge, Chief Executive of LCCI, said: “Nearly half of London’s population lives east of Tower Bridge yet they are served by only two fixed road river crossings.

“It is an area with huge amounts of potential and while the Olympics acted as a crucible for creativity and dynamism in the area, its future growth is being held back by this gap in transport infrastructure”.

The organisation has launched a petition calling on Mayor Boris Johnson to support the scheme.

Local campaigners have long opposed the construction of a bridge in the area and welcomed the Mayor’s decision in 2008 to scrap plans for an earlier scheme. However Mr Johnson has recently u-turned and indicated his support for a new crossing.

Val Shawcross, Labour’s transport spokesperson on the London Assembly, said the Mayor’s initial decision had damaged the area’s economy.

She added: “A new bridge would boost road capacity, public transport connections and cycling and pedestrian routes, but must be designed and managed in a way that minimises noise and air pollution. Additional river crossings in East London are demonstrably needed, and I look forward to TfL’s consultation on how to take this option forward.” 

Sadiq Khan, Labour’s Shadow London Minister and potential Mayoral runner, said London “desperately needs” the bridge.

However Green Party Assembly Member Darren Johnson said evidence to a public inquiry on an earlier scheme had cast doubt on claimed economic benefits.

He added: “Local people have been rejecting plans for this bridge for over thirty years and the latest set of pretty artist drawings won’t disguise the fact that this new road will bring pollution and traffic jams to their area.”

Friends of the Earth Campaigner jenny Bates warned that any increase in road traffic would “worsen air pollution which is currently way over EU limits set to protect health in the area, and was responsible for the premature death of 98 people in Newham and 119 in Greenwich in 2010.”

She called on Transport for London to “invest in a package of non-road measures including more walk, cycle and public transport crossings – which would be cheaper and would also help road users by getting vehicles which don’t need to be there off the existing roads.”

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: News

RECENT UPDATES

Tube and rail users to benefit from Oyster weekly fares cap

Mayor and TfL call on ministers to help plug funding gap

Tube to get full mobile phone coverage from 2024

TfL says Direct Vision Standard is already making HGVs safer for London road users




POPULAR

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

Copyright © 2025 · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy