Lawrence Webb is the UKIP Mayoral candidate
Selected as UKIP’s candidate in September, Webb says: “It’s very hard to maintain a campaign over a very long period but there are things I’ve been doing off camera and I’ve been involved with some for more than a year.”
“The bigger pubic campaign will start at the end of February, that’s when it starts to be in the mindset of the electorate.”
One of the issues he’s concerned about is the effect of Mayor Boris Johnson’s 15-year age limit on Taxis as part of the war on London’s poor air pollution.
“The 15 year age limit on cabs is really 12,” he observes, before posing the question: “are you really going to buy a 12 year old cab knowing it’s going to be off the road and have zero residual value in three years time?”
Webb says he’s concerned that the limit, and the extension of the Low Emission Zone, will drive some traders out of business.
Employment will be a major part of his message and he’s been meeting opponents of the HS2 rail link, a project he warns could make it harder for Londoners to find work.
“What I think it’ll do is, rather than bring jobs to London, it’ll bring commuters from Birmingham. People in London will find it’s a negative impact because suddenly they’re competing with people who think ‘the journey time makes it worthwhile.’”
A fully costed manifesto is promised for the beginning of March, but while Webb is confident he has a well informed message for Londoners, smaller parties often struggle to attract the media space needed to share that message with voters.
How much of an issue is media access for Webb?
“It’s difficult, although we are already getting more media attention than we got this time four years ago, clearly everyone knows what our view is on the European Union but outside of the Euro elections it was rarely in the news.”
“But now people are aware of the Euro debt crisis and what that means, EU regulation on the City, and all these things are much more in the public domain than they’ve ever been. There’s just a much greater awareness of UKIP and what we stand for.”
Webb says the party is hopeful of regaining seats on the London Assembly, repeating their achievement at the 2004 election.
Last year I noted some polls suggested this was possible, but it seemed more likely if Europe played heavily in the news agenda around the election.
Would a consistent run or European stories help the party?
“We’re not a single issue party” he says, “one of the biggest issues we’re campaigning on is jobs for London.”
Webb says EU regulations on the City risk hitting ordinary Londoners far harder than bankers.
“The cleaning contractors, the IT companies, the catering firms, the nearby sandwich bars, restaurants, bars, pubs and cab drivers – they will all see their businesses take a massive hit if the City of London is unfairly targeted.
“We are not talking about the so-called ’1%’ here, we are talking about tens of thousands of hard working everyday Londoners.”
Although Webb is on the list of UKIP’s London-wide Assembly candidates, he’s placed third. Would he not have preferred to head the list as well as the Mayoral ticket?
“The whole [media and public] focus is on the Mayoral election and that’s where I really need to be concentrating. It’s a team effort, and having a couple of guys on the list who can go out and campaign fully for the list is beneficial.”
“I need to focus on the Mayoralty, I don’t want to be sidetracked by the list. And you’d have people saying, ‘You’re not serious [about the Mayoralty], you just want to get elected on the list.”
Does he really believe he could win London’s top job? “We’re a political party and we fight elections, we fight them to win,” he says, but he’s happy to concede that “the place we’re most likely to win is on the list getting a couple of people on the Assembly.”
“That would be a success in our eyes, and to beat Brian Paddick in the Mayoralty would also be a huge success in our eyes.”
For information about Lawrence Webb’s campaign, visit www.ukipmayor.com or follow him on Twitter @UKIPWebb4London
Lawrence mentions the fact that the campaign begins later in the month, but the big difficulty for him will be the electronic media, which is where this election is fought. If he has not already done so, he will find that when the campaign itself begins, he will actually be stopped from appearing in any meaningful way on television, and he will receive very small and almost meaningless spots on the radio. It’s not just him, it’s also the other “minor” parties, because state radio and television in the UK (the BBC) sets up anti-democratic restrictions (masquerading as equality) which are imposed on the coverage of small parties of all broadcasters. If Lawrence appears, then all the other “minor” candidates in his bracket have to appear on exactly the same basis. The “:main” ones are exempt from this particular aspect as they have their own bracket (which effectively means limitless coverage every night). So his message will not really be heard by the vast majority of the voters. And of course he is barred by the pincer movement of the state which does not allow him even to send one piece of literature to his electorate to counter the anti-democratic restrictions on his candidature by the state. If he wanted to send several letters, leaflets etc to the electorate he would end up in jail for breaching the spending guidelines. In fact he would be disbarred for sending even one. So the “main” three receive millions of pounds worth of free advertising through the BBC to the entire electorate, but the others are actively prevented from getting their massage across by the state and the BBC. This is why I withdrew from the last mayor election because I looked at the disgraceful rules set up by the BBC and state on restrictions and realised that it was impossible. We had to refuse the money we were offered because we were barred from spending it and even writing to the electorate.
Lawrencee has plenty of experience unfortunately unlike 2004 when i was a late addition to list,due to splits i eventually finished 5th on list, we had Frank maloney and it kept up publicity till election day.This time the cut off will be april, with Ken vBoris show.
I believe most of the Cadidates are genuine,although i would like to see a Legal sanction,if someone defects they MUST Step down.
IMHO UKIP’s weakness it still is seen as ”Offshoot of tory party” hampering us in North west and Scotland. Also in 2004 we had usdrivers,HGV drivers,Hi-tech,Admin clerical stafff represent us, now we mostly have ”Professionals” all very worthy but people waiting to get on housing ladder,Unemployed through no fault of their own can relate to.So Flatlining is not an option.In superonstituencies
some people are not representing areas ‘They live in,shooting themselves in the foot.However as a supporter of 18 years,Member for nearly 16,to Carp is not good for Morale, So good luck to the team.
should say busdrivers,;cannot relate to. this minute type leads to typos!
Lawrence is the only candidate who is speaking up for London, and above all its people, jobs, businesses, and the City.
I think he makes a very good point about lack of media coverage. I am not sure the election could rightly be called fair given the bias towards reporting only the three establishment parties and the favoured Greens. If voters don’t have full information it is difficult to see how they can make an informed choice.