• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS
  • COMMENT
  • CONTACT
  • Twitter

Current polling would see UKIP return to the London Assembly

November 4, 2011 - Martin Hoscik@martinhoscik

At the 2000 London Assembly elections, UKIP attracted just under 2% of the London-wide ‘list’ vote.

Four years later, when City Hall elections coincided with the Euro elections, they gained a further 6% and two seats on the Assembly.

Their time on the Assembly was short lived as I’ve recounted before, but their election proved that an openly Eurosceptic message plays well with enough Londoners to gain seats.

Fast forward another four years to 2008 when Europe wasn’t part of the election discussion and they lost their seats.

But the issue of Europe, and the UK’s relationship with it, is now ever present in the news cycle and, as others have noted, UKIP are now polling just behind the Liberal Democrats at national level.

Until a couple of days ago the party was doing less well in London, appealing to just 4% of voters.

But things seem to be looking up for Nigel Farage’s crew – yesterday’s YouGov tracker gave them 7% in the capital, likely to be enough for at least one seat around the Assembly table next May.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Tagged With: 2012 London Election

Comments

  1. Damian Hockney says

    November 5, 2011 at 2:33 am

    Very interesting. National (and regional) opinion polling is to some degree reflected in the Assembly election results, partly because voters really do not know what the London Assembly is for. If they did know it was supposed to be a body for oversight and holding to account, then of course voters would not put in place a Mayor for one party and an Assembly with so many members of the same party. They would in fact logically do the opposite because your own party is not really going to hold you to account in a meaningful sense.

    There is no doubt that when Peter Hulme Cross and I were elected to the London Assembly for UKIP in 2004, it was because the European Elections were on the same day and the story of the day was ‘UKIP and Kilroy’. Enough to get us two seats.

    UKIP is in fact in a very interesting position again because the Conservatives have clearly once again said one thing about EU control of the UK during elections to gain votes and done the opposite when in power (as they have done for 40 years of course – we’ll all learn one day)- the executive (which is what counts) is happy to hand over yet more powers to the EU and to support the ratchet envisaged by Lisbon (which guarantees automatic transfers of more powers in a way that individual member states cannot stop). As this occurs, so a percentage of Tories (and curiously LibDems in some parts of the country) transfer their votes and affection to UKIP. With the LibDems very weak and the Tories clearly seen as two faced on the EU, UKIP could indeed achieve a seat next year.

  2. Stephen Barraclough says

    November 6, 2011 at 9:20 am

    I have an idea that: everyone realises – if nothing else from the party’s title – that UKIP is somewhat opposed to the EU (!), but how many realise just how comprehensive and eminently sensible the rest of the party’s policy document reads?
    Perhaps if we challenged the other parties directly, not from the prospect of their performance – all know how pathetic that has been, and is – but directly with quotes from OUR policy document, we might strike a realistic chord with many many more people?
    Give it a thought: choose a chapter at random, and see just how well it could work in this way!
    I feel that our representatives in debates and interviews are too easily sidelined into ‘the old stereotype’ they have come to know. We allow this stereotype to dominate peoples’ impression of the party, which is that, basically we are o ‘one shot’ party, when in reality NO OTHER PARTY will put their future intentions ON LINE as we do!

  3. Damian Hockney says

    November 10, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    Stephen, remember always though that the devil is in the detail. With regard to the London Mayor campaign, the party needs to realise that it will find it very difficult to fight its way through during the campaign itself. I have written on this site before about the fact that smaller parties are actually restricted from coverage by the BBC guidelines (which apply to all broadcasters) and that these are both unfair and a guarantee of free coverage worth millions of pounds to the “major” parties and restricted late night slots of seconds for parties like UKIP. And of course you are not allowed to buy coverage, unlike Obama who could raise a fortune and spend it! You need to get in there with London policies now, based upon properly costed ideas which strike a chord. UKIP is in a good position to do this and has the ability to do this – but try to avoid generalities like “working to reduce crime” (after all, none of the other parties are working to increase crime” – well not intentionally…).

RECENT UPDATES

TfL appoints permanent finance chief while Tube boss passes day to day responsibility for the service to his deputies

Sadiq Khan’s claims about LPG’s “limited” air quality benefits challenged by industry body

In an age of devolution the UK’s arcane Purdah rules simply hinder good government

At City Hall, the Mayor and London Assembly are already helping to reduce single-use plastic




Popular

Sadiq announces £500,000 in grants to support London’s creative firms and workers

TfL hopes to cash-in with auction of sector-exclusive advertising rights along the Elizabeth line

The protestors are wrong, Sadiq is delivering his clean energy pledges

London’s contactless fares system to power New York’s subway, bus and rail journeys

FEATURED

London’s bus ridership is falling three times faster than the rest of England’s

Soarings costs will damage smaller firms’ ability to support the economy, warns FSB

Business leaders say Mayor should use derelict Green belt land to provide thousands of homes for 999 workers

How Transport for London and Waze are using data sharing to keep London’s traffic moving

GOT A STORY?

As the original London news and scrutiny site we've been casting an eye over the capital's public services and politicians since 1999.

 

Many of our top stories started with a tip-off from a reader - if you've got something you'd like us to cover get in touch and we'll do the rest.

Stay In Touch

  • E-mail
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2018 MayorWatch Publications Limited · MayorWatch is Registered Trademark · All Rights Reserved · Contact Us · Terms of Use

MayorWatch Publications Limited · 20-22 Wenlock Road · London N1 7GU · Company Number 6291816

MayorWatch uses cookies to ensure we give you the best experience on our site. Accept If you continue without changing your browser settings, we'll assume that you agree to our use of cookies. Read our privacy policy.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.