<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assembly Tories accuse rival parties of &#8220;squalid&#8221; stitchup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691</link>
	<description>London News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:21:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hoscik</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hoscik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 10:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>Hi Leo

The rag bag comment wasn&#039;t made by Roger, it was made by one of his colleagues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Leo</p>
<p>The rag bag comment wasn&#8217;t made by Roger, it was made by one of his colleagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>In Political term&#039;s can someone explain to me what &quot; Rag Bag Minorities &quot; actually means as I may wish to responed to Roger Even&#039;s comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Political term&#8217;s can someone explain to me what &#8221; Rag Bag Minorities &#8221; actually means as I may wish to responed to Roger Even&#8217;s comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>In Political term&#039;s can someone explain to me what &quot; Rag Bag Minorits &quot; actually means as I may wish to responed to Roger Even&#039;s comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Political term&#8217;s can someone explain to me what &#8221; Rag Bag Minorits &#8221; actually means as I may wish to responed to Roger Even&#8217;s comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>The claim that this deal &quot;mirrors the deals&quot; done in 2000 and 2004 is erroneous. Most notably, the 2000 deal involved the Lib Dems sharing power with Labour although they seem keen to forget that small point now.

The circumstances also vary in other important ways, as I explain in my own blog report of the meeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The claim that this deal &#8220;mirrors the deals&#8221; done in 2000 and 2004 is erroneous. Most notably, the 2000 deal involved the Lib Dems sharing power with Labour although they seem keen to forget that small point now.</p>
<p>The circumstances also vary in other important ways, as I explain in my own blog report of the meeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexi</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>Finally someone is recognizin the fine work Victoria Borwick does, make her chairman rather than deputy, why should someone &quot;who represnts a large swathe of London voters&quot; be placed in a cerimonial position?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone is recognizin the fine work Victoria Borwick does, make her chairman rather than deputy, why should someone &#8220;who represnts a large swathe of London voters&#8221; be placed in a cerimonial position?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>It was Boris Johnson that accused Ken&#039;s men of corruption and syphoning money of projects that were financed by the London tax payers. All this was claimed during Boris Johnson&#039;s campaigning to become Mayor for London. But later all this was disproved after Boris Johnson became Mayor for London. There was no corruption or mis-use of public money by Ken Livingston&#039;s office or employee&#039;s so it looks like Boris and his conservative adviser&#039;s misled the public to gain votes to become Mayor. So who has stitched who up. It looks a bit like Boris Johnson and his conservative&#039;s are the stitch up merchants. So much for Boris Johnson&#039;s Transparency and Accountablity. Boris and the conservative Piliticians want their bread buttered both sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was Boris Johnson that accused Ken&#8217;s men of corruption and syphoning money of projects that were financed by the London tax payers. All this was claimed during Boris Johnson&#8217;s campaigning to become Mayor for London. But later all this was disproved after Boris Johnson became Mayor for London. There was no corruption or mis-use of public money by Ken Livingston&#8217;s office or employee&#8217;s so it looks like Boris and his conservative adviser&#8217;s misled the public to gain votes to become Mayor. So who has stitched who up. It looks a bit like Boris Johnson and his conservative&#8217;s are the stitch up merchants. So much for Boris Johnson&#8217;s Transparency and Accountablity. Boris and the conservative Piliticians want their bread buttered both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/assembly-tories-accuse-rival-parties-of-squalid-deals/20097691/comment-page-1#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/?p=7691#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Tony Arbour&#039;s a waste of space. Congratulations to Darren and Jennette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Arbour&#8217;s a waste of space. Congratulations to Darren and Jennette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
