• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MayorWatch

London News and Comment

  • NEWS

ASA rules unauthorised congestion charge payment site is “misleading”

January 9, 2014 by Martin Hoscik

Image: TfL
Image: TfL
The Advertising Standards Authority has ordered an unauthorised congestion charge payment website to make significant changes to ensure drivers do not mistake it for an official site.

Last year Transport for London warned drivers not to use unauthorised third party sites which often levy a surcharge and, in some cases, fail to register vehicles with TfL.

The capital’s transport agency estimates around 1,000 people per day are being duped into using unofficial sites. In some cases motorists have found themselves facing a £130 penalty after the site they paid failed to register their journey with TfL.

The ASA has now ruled that the design of one site – paylondoncongestion.co.uk – was “likely to lead consumers to believe that the web page was an official method of paying the London congestion charge and was affiliated with TfL.“

Although the site carried a disclaimer stating it was not associated with TfL, the ASA said it was “concerned by the small size of that text and its placement beneath the booking form, which in our view rendered the information insufficiently prominent on the page.

“However, we were also concerned that the information in the small print contradicted the overall impression created by the design of the web page, the direct link to the TfL website and the headline claim “Pay London Congestion Charge Online”.

The watchdog said that “changes to the layout of the web page, including, but not limited to, the prominence of the information that paylondoncongestion.co.uk was not owned by or affiliated with TfL, needed to be made in order to ensure that the nature of the service offered was clearly communicated to consumers.”

The site’s operators had undertaken to make changes but the ASA said these “would not go far enough to resolve the issue.”

It therefore upheld a complaint that the website was misleading as well as a complaint that the site was misleading visitors because it failed to clearly state the charges users would pay.

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: News

RECENT UPDATES

Tube and rail users to benefit from Oyster weekly fares cap

Mayor and TfL call on ministers to help plug funding gap

Tube to get full mobile phone coverage from 2024

TfL says Direct Vision Standard is already making HGVs safer for London road users




POPULAR

City Hall to move to Docklands as Mayor seeks to raise £55m for frontline services

‘Concern’ over TfL’s ability to deliver major projects in wake of Crossrail cost overruns

City Hall halts London Overground ticket office closures but many will still see opening hours reduced

Transport for London confirms bus cuts will go ahead despite passenger opposition

Copyright © 2025 · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy