Boris Johnson has announced a raft of fare increases which will see a single Oyster Pay as You Go bus trip increase to 90p plus higher costs for bus passes and season tickets. Overall fares will increase by six per cent in 2009.
On the underground the £4 adult cash fare via Zone 1 is frozen, while the £3 non-Zone 1 fare rises to £3.20. There are also changes to Oyster Pay as You Go (PAYG) fares on the Tube and travelcards. Off-peak tube travelers will be able to take advantage of a new daytime off-peak reduced fare which will operate between 9.30am and 4.00pm.
Free travel for under 11s is to be continued but the PAYG flat fare for 11-15s on the Tube increases from 50p to 55p. The minimum adult cash fare of £1.50 on the DLR and Overground rises to £1.60.
Mayor Johnson also confirmed the extension of the Freedom Pass to 24hrs and, after months of contradictory statements by City Hall and Transport for London, announced there is to be a new half-price travel scheme for those on Income Support.
Mr Johnson defended the increases by blaming the “largesse” of former Mayor Ken Livingstone who he accused of overseeing an “irresponsible pre-election fares freeze” which City Hall claim created a budget short-fall of £80m.
Mr Livingstone denied this was the case and insisted “Londoners are now having to pay through the nose for Boris Johnson’s wrong policy decisions and waste.”
Since coming to office Johnson has embarked on a series of measures which have impacted on TfL’s budget. In May he announced plans to give up an annual £15m from Venezuela aimed at helping London’s poorest and in July paid out £400,000 to a charity nominated by Porsche after scrapping plans to introduce a £25 CO2 Charge which some calculations suggest would have raised up to £50m a year.
The Mayor is also consulting on plans to scrap the Western Extension of the Congestion Charge which would lead to further reductions in TfL’s income.
The Mayor said he was “determined to deliver value for money for London’s farepayers and taxpayers and that will mean some tough choices. But let no-one be in any doubt. We’re investing billions to improve transport in London, prepare for 2012 and deliver Crossrail. This is a fares package that will sustain the investment needed to deliver the extra capacity and reliability that is vital for London.”
Reaction
Labour’s London Assembly transport spokesperson, Val Shawcross, described the fare increase as “unnecessary” and said it would “hit the pocket of every Londoner hard and makes a complete mockery of the Mayor’s promise to provide value for money.”
“Boris Johnson has given us no evidence whatsoever for his claim that there is a transport finance blackhole. What the evidence does point to is an increase in passenger numbers and revenue in TfL’s coffers. If anything there should be a surplus this year, as there was in previous years. For Boris to blame his predecessor for this fare hike is nothing more than a cheap political shot.”
“If the Mayor genuinely is concerned about the fares budget then he should have thought twice abolishing the £25 higher charge for gas guzzlers and should reconsider his expensive plans to replace the bendy bus.”
Green Party Assembly Member Darren Johnson claimed any funding shortfall at TfL was the result of Mayor Johnson’s pro-car stance, commenting: “If Boris was not exploring the possibility of scrapping the western extension of the congestion charge, or had not abolished the £25 charge on gas guzzling vehicles, I doubt he would have this financial black hole to plug. His actions to protect motorists are likely to lose TfL around £110m annually and it would be grossly unfair for public transport users to be forced to meet these costs.”
Mike Tuffrey AM, the Liberal Democrat’s group leader at the London Assembly said: “Last year the Liberal Democrats pointed out Ken Livingstone’s fare freeze was unsustainable and this announcement proves us right.”
Tuffrey accused Mayor Johnson of failing to “outline exactly how a inflation busting increase in fares will benefit the hard pressed traveller on London’s transport network.”
David Leibling from passenger watchdog London TravelWatch said: “We welcome the new off-peak fare, which may encourage people to avoid the busiest times, but the change will have to be fully advertised, so passengers can take advantage of the cheaper fares, and also to avoid people returning in the peak with an off-peak ticket.”
“We have reservations about capacity on an already-crowded transport network with more people travelling free at the busiest times now the Freedom Pass will be accepted 24 hours a day. However, we do welcome the retention of half-price fares for those on Income Support, passengers who cannot afford public transport, but who rely on it greatly.”
A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson’s claim that his swingeing fare attacks on Londoners are due to Ken Livingstone’s ‘largesse’ is totally false and a transparent attempt to pass the buck for the costs of his own wrong policies and waste, including abandoning the charge on gas-guzzlers costing between £30 million and £50 million a year, abandoning the cheap oil deal with Venezuela worth £16 million a year, and the possible dropping of the congestion charge zone in Kensington and Chelsea which would throw away even more money. Cavalier future plans of the Boris Johnson administration would cost even more, such as £100 million for a new ‘routemaster’ bus. London has a Mayor who transfers millions of pounds from ordinary Londoners who use public transport to drivers of gas guzzlers and residents of Kensington and Chelsea.”
I have been waiting for this one ever since Boris got elected.
Lesson 1 of Public funds management - always secure your replacement income before you start making concessions. If you noticed throughout the Livingstone era this was clearly the policy. It may seem a little devious, but it softens the blow if you make sure good news follows bad. This is another Boris Johnson PR disaster.
The public will be incensed that the majority of public transport users are now effectively having to subsidise the decision not to charge the most polluting vehicles in London. It may only seem like a small amount, but it’s on top of many others. Unlike Ken’s fare hikes, this is to fill a gap and not actuall to raise money for later improvements.
Boris is clearly a knee jerk reaction politician and it’s now showing. His pandering to perceived public sentiment has been costly and now he has to face up to it. Sure you can get thousands of people to sign a petition to bring back routemasters (even me) - but if you said “but fares will have to rise as a result” - many would change their minds quite rapidly (including me).
Ken was a master at this - sometimes you have to make decisions that are unpopular (and my god he was unpopular sometimes), but in the same way a father has to be unpopular to his children when he knows it’s in their best interests.
I shall be very interested to see how this one plays out.
…and as for that black hole - does anyone really believe Ken was fighting hard at the election knowing there was a £110 million pound black hole waiting for him? I think not Boris - we’re obviously not as much as a pushover as your blindly biased Henley electorate were.
can we expect more price hikes to pay for scrapping the western congestion charge zone?
Here’s an idea Boris – turn the heating off on London’s buses. Let’s face it, when it’s cold outside we are dressed accordingly. We don’t need our buses heated when we’re already wearing coats, scarves, gloves, etc., particularly as buses are so often crowded and offer so very little ventilation.
However, this what really frustrates. Throughout the summer even when it was as warm as 27-28º, the heating on the buses was still turned on! I made a point of checking this and I think only one journey (of my regular commute) throughout the entire summer was the heating not switched on.
Common sense should surely prevail here. Let’s disable the heating function (OK, the driver might need some heating, granted) on the upper deck at least, thereby saving valuable energy/fuel and money.
Given the well known fact that staff costs are a huge amount of the cost of running a transport system, he’d be better off scrapping his labour intensive bendy bus abolition and Routemaster plans, really.
he scraps the £25 gas guzzler congestion charge and then increases public transport prices.
i voted for boris and i am very disapointed.
typical conservitive my dad says,i disagree typical politician more like.
the next time i wont be voting politicians are all the same.
the political system has lost yet another young voter.
dont have faith in politics u will find the faith misplaced.
this is something that will never happen, a politician that tells you the negatives as well as the positives for the good of the country and not his party or himself.
at least red ken had the right idea even if he was going the wrong way about it.
Stu,
I couldn’t agree more about the heaters. My favourite annoyance in summer, I’ve caught a packed 493 in 30 degree heat and the heaters were blasting. The drivers claim they are ’set on at the garage and they cannot switch them off’.
I think the biggest problem is that very few of the ‘fat controllers’ actually us public transport. How can you manage something when you never use it!
I don’t want to sound like a Ken supporter, but at least he caught the Jubilee line every morning.
Have I read this right?
Boris cancels a scheme which could have raised £50m, gives away another £15m on top of paying out half a million to settle a court case and then blames someone else for the lack of funds as he mugs public transport users?
Be afraid, be very afraid…
I’m surprised you are all so surprised. A populist was voted in ousting a realist, and the result is that you get populist, unrealistic policies. What do you expect. Not voting is hardly an answer, but not voting a populist into power might well be.